Shock in the Supreme Court: The CJI Shoe Attack
In a startling event that has captured nationwide attention, a lawyer attempted a CJI shoe attack on Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai inside the Supreme Court on October 6, 2025. The incident, rare in India’s legal history, took place during routine court proceedings but quickly escalated into a tense courtroom drama.
The Incident: What Happened
The assailant, identified as 71-year-old advocate Rakesh Kishore, approached the dais and attempted to remove his shoe, intending to hurl it at CJI Gavai. Witnesses reported that Kishore shouted slogans, including “Sanatan ka apman nahi sahenge” (We will not tolerate the insult to Sanatan), suggesting the act was motivated by religious or ideological sentiments.
Security personnel were quick to act, restraining the lawyer and escorting him out of the courtroom. Despite the chaos, CJI Gavai maintained his composure, continuing the hearing and reassuring everyone, “These things do not affect me.”
Possible Motivation Behind the Attack
The CJI shoe attack appears linked to comments made by CJI Gavai during a hearing concerning the restoration of a seven-foot beheaded idol of Lord Vishnu at the Javari Temple in Khajuraho, Madhya Pradesh. The Chief Justice had remarked, “Go and ask the deity now,” which some interpreted as disrespectful to Hindu sentiments. This sparked significant online backlash, which may have influenced Kishore’s actions.
Security and Judicial Response
Following the incident, Delhi Police have initiated a full investigation into the attempted attack. Legal experts, including senior jurist Indira Jaising, have emphasized that such acts undermine the dignity of the judiciary and must be condemned unequivocally.
The Supreme Court has always maintained strict security protocols, but this incident highlights the ongoing challenges faced in ensuring the safety of judicial officers, particularly when ideological sentiments escalate into physical threats.
Public and Media Reaction
The CJI shoe attack has sparked widespread discussion across social media and news platforms. While many expressed concern over the breach of courtroom decorum, others praised CJI Gavai’s calm and composed response, noting that his demeanor reflected the resilience and integrity of India’s judiciary.
The Larger Implications
This shocking event raises pressing questions about the intersection of ideological beliefs and the independence of the judiciary. Courtrooms, intended as spaces of law and order, must remain safe from personal vendettas or politically motivated acts. Experts suggest that enhanced security measures, coupled with public awareness, are necessary to prevent similar incidents in the future.
Conclusion
The CJI shoe attack serves as a stark reminder of the challenges faced by India’s judiciary in balancing public sentiment and maintaining judicial authority. Despite the attack, CJI BR Gavai’s calm response underscores the strength of India’s judicial system in the face of unexpected threats.
Sources: The Tribune, Money Control, IndianExpress
For more on current events, check out our full coverage of the French PM Resigned and stay updated on the latest developments.
